clergyewilliam clergyewilliam
  • 04-09-2017
  • History
contestada

Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historical event

Respuesta :

LearnGrow
LearnGrow LearnGrow
  • 04-09-2017
Primary source is the firsthand experience and evidence of an event, where the any given information first appeared (initial report). The secondary source uses the first source in order to give its information (for example: document that analyzes primary source documents).
When analyzing historical event a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source because he uses the primary source as the imput information (facts, events, dates, names) in order to analyze them, connect them and explain them in his work.
Answer Link

Otras preguntas

I need help with finding the answer of 21 laps in 7 minutes
Describe how cells are organized into larger and larger groups to help living things survive
Are pencils biotic or abiotic because its not living but it was made out of wood which was a live
will enyone help me answer this question please
is the original climax community in an ecosystem more likely to be restored after a natural disturbance or a human-caused disturbance?
Are pencils biotic or abiotic because its not living but it was made out of wood which was a live
what does genercized mean
PLEASE HELP ME Color corresponds to the ______________ of light waves. wave speed cycles wavelength
Solve for x: x2 + 8x = -1
Meiosis is different from the process shown because, during meiosis, A) chromosomes are not replicated. B) two gametes are made for every original cell. C) four